TessEQ2 + Newest Dev Code = Bad
- John Adams
- Retired
- Posts: 9684
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:27 am
- EQ2Emu Server: EQ2Emulator Test Center
- Characters: John
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
TessEQ2 + Newest Dev Code = Bad
Scat,
That problem I was trying to explain on IRC is happening now on Tess, where clients disconnect, but never get dropped from the world. Says there's 4 clients on now, but after logging in, there's actually only 1 active, and that player might not even really be there right this moment (no response, no activity). The world actually did add and remove my 1 character fine, so maybe this is something to do with a specific client version (maybe SF?) not being unhooked properly.
Dunno, but I am fairly sure if I left the server running, eventually it'll get into a deadlock and be unresponsive. Take a look if you have time, see if you can see anything obvious with why char's get stuck as active when they're not. We really need to re-stabilize this world. Again, it was fine with a mid-May SVN.
That problem I was trying to explain on IRC is happening now on Tess, where clients disconnect, but never get dropped from the world. Says there's 4 clients on now, but after logging in, there's actually only 1 active, and that player might not even really be there right this moment (no response, no activity). The world actually did add and remove my 1 character fine, so maybe this is something to do with a specific client version (maybe SF?) not being unhooked properly.
Dunno, but I am fairly sure if I left the server running, eventually it'll get into a deadlock and be unresponsive. Take a look if you have time, see if you can see anything obvious with why char's get stuck as active when they're not. We really need to re-stabilize this world. Again, it was fine with a mid-May SVN.
- Scatman
- Retired
- Posts: 1688
- Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:44 am
- EQ2Emu Server: Scatman's Word
- Characters: Scatman
- Location: New Jersey
Re: TessEQ2 + Newest Dev Code = Bad
Ok. you mind keeping Tess in that state until after work? 
We need to figure out a way to track client version upon connect, that'd be cool.
We need to figure out a way to track client version upon connect, that'd be cool.
- Scatman
- Retired
- Posts: 1688
- Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:44 am
- EQ2Emu Server: Scatman's Word
- Characters: Scatman
- Location: New Jersey
Re: TessEQ2 + Newest Dev Code = Bad
Not letting me RD in. And yes, I know my password this time 
- John Adams
- Retired
- Posts: 9684
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:27 am
- EQ2Emu Server: EQ2Emulator Test Center
- Characters: John
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Re: TessEQ2 + Newest Dev Code = Bad
nm, duh. I can get it off your last post
Edit x3: Ok, you should have access, annnnnd, I think she's in that state now. Saw an AddAuth that failed, with 1 zone, 4 clients.
- John Adams
- Retired
- Posts: 9684
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:27 am
- EQ2Emu Server: EQ2Emulator Test Center
- Characters: John
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Re: TessEQ2 + Newest Dev Code = Bad
Scat, Tess seems locked with 1 player again. If you can, take a look? or did you not find anything the last time? and, is there debugging that could be enabled?
- John Adams
- Retired
- Posts: 9684
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:27 am
- EQ2Emu Server: EQ2Emulator Test Center
- Characters: John
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Re: TessEQ2 + Newest Dev Code = Bad
Scathole... I have an oddity on this to share. I ran Dev rev 1150 for 2 weeks, and Tess took calls like nobody's business. No issues with zones hanging up, or comms getting locked up.
I bumped 1 rev, to 1151, and we're toast after 1 connect on day 1.
The ONLY change to 1150->1151 is that you told NPCs to always face the most hated player in combat. That's it. I cannot see how this is affecting the server in this way, so maybe it is a coincidence?
Reverting back 1 rev, and testing again.
I bumped 1 rev, to 1151, and we're toast after 1 connect on day 1.
The ONLY change to 1150->1151 is that you told NPCs to always face the most hated player in combat. That's it. I cannot see how this is affecting the server in this way, so maybe it is a coincidence?
Reverting back 1 rev, and testing again.
- Eradani
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 6:25 am
- Location: Saskatchewan
Re: TessEQ2 + Newest Dev Code = Bad
recompile 1151 ??
my client version: 12682L, 2016/06/06
last one that will run on XP cause i'm just a stick-in-the-mud
last one that will run on XP cause i'm just a stick-in-the-mud
- John Adams
- Retired
- Posts: 9684
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:27 am
- EQ2Emu Server: EQ2Emulator Test Center
- Characters: John
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Re: TessEQ2 + Newest Dev Code = Bad
I always compile my own binaries, since i am always in debug mode.
- Scatman
- Retired
- Posts: 1688
- Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:44 am
- EQ2Emu Server: Scatman's Word
- Characters: Scatman
- Location: New Jersey
Re: TessEQ2 + Newest Dev Code = Bad
Interesting. But nice catch. May be something I overlooked. Ill be home tomorrow night and will look at it Monday
- John Adams
- Retired
- Posts: 9684
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:27 am
- EQ2Emu Server: EQ2Emulator Test Center
- Characters: John
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Re: TessEQ2 + Newest Dev Code = Bad
dunno Scat, not sure how 1 line of code could effect it - but maybe the fact the NPC is still doing a FaceTarget() repeatedly, when a zone is trying to shut down? Dunno. You'll get it tho. I have faith =)
btw, love the pics I'm seeing if you "vacationing"... starting to wonder if someone super-glued a beer in your hand, because I always see you with one. even sleeping.
btw, love the pics I'm seeing if you "vacationing"... starting to wonder if someone super-glued a beer in your hand, because I always see you with one. even sleeping.
- John Adams
- Retired
- Posts: 9684
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:27 am
- EQ2Emu Server: EQ2Emulator Test Center
- Characters: John
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Re: TessEQ2 + Newest Dev Code = Bad
Scatty,
I saw Tess' last connect was 2 days ago, so I thought it was hung up... but alas, there really hasn't been a single connect attempt tot he only running server in 2 whole days... sigh. Anyway.
I now believe that the FaceTarget() fix you put in may be causing a deadlock. Not sure how, but maybe you can dig that out. Definitely happened in 1151. I am running current dev code, debug, minus the 1151 commit, and the server is fine.
(so far)
FYI, Plane leaves in the AM so I'll see ya's!
I saw Tess' last connect was 2 days ago, so I thought it was hung up... but alas, there really hasn't been a single connect attempt tot he only running server in 2 whole days... sigh. Anyway.
I now believe that the FaceTarget() fix you put in may be causing a deadlock. Not sure how, but maybe you can dig that out. Definitely happened in 1151. I am running current dev code, debug, minus the 1151 commit, and the server is fine.
(so far)
FYI, Plane leaves in the AM so I'll see ya's!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests